Texas Town Sues to Uphold Fracking Ban, Protect Democracy
Anastasia Pantsios :: EcoWatch :: 5 December 2014
The little guys aren’t taking this one lying down. In November, voters in Denton, Texas—fed up with oil and gas drilling companies unwilling to work with citizens to put some reasonable protections in place and with state and local regulators for allowing new fracking wells near homes, schools, parks and hospitals—passed a ban on fracking, despite being hugely outspent. The Texas Oil and Gas Association, representing the fracking companies, and the state’s General Land Office responded with lawsuits to protect their “right” to push fracking on unwilling residents.
 |
| Even kids can’t help noticing the impact of fracking on their community. Image credit: Frack Free Denton |
Now Denton is fighting back with lawsuits of its own. Yesterday, with the fracking ban taking effect on Tuesday, the Denton Drilling Awareness Group (DAG) and Earthworks, the groups that led the Frack Free Denton ballot initiative, filed intervention papers in both lawsuits, seeking to assert the right of citizens to decide what happens in their own neighborhoods. The groups are represented by the Texas local government law firm Brown & Hofmeister; attorneys from national environmental organizations Earthjustice and the Natural Resources Defense Council are asking the permission of the court to act as co-counsel.
“Denton residents, with Republican and Democratic majorities, voted overwhelmingly to ban fracking,” said DAG president Cathy McMullen. “Our city has the legal power to prevent bakeries from setting up shop in residential neighborhoods. To suggest that we don’t have the legal power to similarly bar fracking, a much more dangerous process, is the height of industry arrogance.”
“The state and industry could have respected Denton communities’ health, safety and property,” said Earthworks’ energy program director Bruce Baizel. “They chose not to. The ban is the result. Now, rather than constructively engage with the community, they simply overlook their regulatory failure and move to overturn democracy through legal action.”
 |
| Fracking wells are literally in residents’ back yards. Photo credit: Frack Free Denton |
At issue is whether local communities have the right to regulate oil and gas operations within their borders or whether, as the lawsuits by the oil and gas interests claim, Denton’s voter-approved ordinance is overridden by state regulators in contradiction of Texas’ long tradition of home rule authority over gas and oil development. There are many other local oil and gas regulations in effect across Texas, including in Dallas just to the south of Denton, which seems to contradict the contention of the frack-friendly interests.
“The State of Texas has granted municipalities the right to oversee oil and gas operations,” Earthjustice managing attorney Deborah Goldberg pointed out. “The people of Denton have exercised that right, and we intend to help preserve it. Communities from California to Texas to New York are fed up with the abuses of the oil and gas industry. When state and federal officials won’t stand up for the public, citizens must have the right to use local democracy to protect themselves.”
 |
| Denton citizens mobilized to ban fracking in their community and aren’t going to back down in the face of gas and oil companies’ lawsuits. Photo credit: Frack Free Denton |
“This fight cuts to the heart of our democracy, and it is far from over,” said Natural Resources Defense Council attorney Dan Raichel. “The people of Denton have voted to keep fracking away from their homes and schools—they will not be bullied by powerful oil and gas companies that want to make a profit at the expense of their health. Denton is a pioneer in Texas, but it is not alone. This community joins hundreds of others around the country—and in Texas—that are demanding the right to determine what happens within their own borders.”
This article sums up the elephant in the room when it comes to the fracking industry and its effect on individuals and communities. The proponents of the fracking industry see nothing wrong with concept of industrializing (sacrificing) 1/7 of the provincial land mass, numerous communities and villages, and the assets of individuals for the benefit of a foreign corporation and a small select group of individuals. Even if the fracking industry were not inherently dangerous, toxic and promoting climate change, the industry is not feasible unless the process has not limits. Should not this industry be forced to compensate the individuals, towns and villages affected, i.e. purchase the land mass that they need in lieu of royalties? Should not individuals, villages and towns be able to say yes or no to what industries they wish to have as neighbours? Richard Lachance
No comments:
Post a Comment