IEA Report: Wind and Solar Can Carry Bulk of Energy Transformation
IEA finds that integration of renewables into electricity grids can be done at little cost.
RenewEconomy, Jonathan Gifford
March 3, 2014
March 3, 2014
The International Energy Agency (IEA) has released a report concluding that integration of large amounts of renewable energy can be achieved by any country at only a small increase on whole-system costs, compared with the current fossil-fuel-heavy electricity systems.
Making the conclusion even more startling is the fact that the IEA used present-day costs for solar PV and wind, with the two most widely deployed renewable energy technologies set to provide the bulk of the generating capacity in these transformed electricity systems.
While renewable energy is often blamed for driving electricity prices up and having a costly destabilizing affect on electricity grids, the IEA says that integration of renewables into electricity grids and markets can be done so at little cost. For the first 5 percent to 10 percent of what it calls variable renewable energy (VRE, essentially wind and solar), the IEA says this poses no technical or economic challenges at all. Even for higher levels of up to 45 percent penetration, the reports says it would cost only 10 percent to 15 percent more than the status quo.
The IEA says the key to incorporating high levels of wind and solar is for countries to employ renewable energy in a way that supports the grid, investing in additional flexible generating capacity and improving the operation of electricity markets.
“Integration is not simply about adding wind and solar on top of ‘business as usual,” said IEA Executive Director Maria van der Hoeven. “We need to transform the system as a whole to do this cost-effectively.”
The IEA report divides the world’s electricity markets and systems into two power systems: “stable” in more developed economies such as Australia’s and “dynamic” for emerging economies such as India, China and Brazil. The challenge for countries like Australia is that new generating capacity is not necessarily needed, with electricity demand falling. As such, deciding who will pay for stranded assets when power plants are retired before the end of their life will be a challenge.
New generation capacity is needed in “stable” economies in the form of renewables and in flexible capacity. The IEA report sees little role in the transformed electricity systems for inflexible generators. During questions after the main presentation of the report, the IEA team pointed to Denmark as an example of how existing coal generators were retrofitted to be able to ramp quickly to support wind generation -- which provides 100 percent of the required electricity at times. Electric boilers, used to supply civic heating schemes, can also take surplus supply off the grid on windy days.
It also notes that wind and solar can be even more cost-effectively introduced into emerging economies, because there is not the issue of sunken costs. That contradicts a lot of fossil-fuel industry claims that suggest fossil fuels are still the best option for those without access to electricity.
According to van der Hoeven, “These surmountable challenges should not let us lose sight of the benefits renewables can bring for energy security and fighting dangerous climate change. If OECD countries want to maintain their position as frontrunners in this industry, they will need to tackle these questions head-on.”
The risk of applying renewables to an untransformed system, the IEA concluded, is that electricity costs will be pushed up. The IEA modeled this scenario, finding that total system costs can increase up to 40 percent. The IEA panel acknowledged that costs have been added to the electricity systems of countries that have driven the early stages of renewable energy deployment, such as Germany, but paid testament to the role it has played in delivering the demand sufficient to bring the price of renewable energy down.
The “dynamic” economies are well positioned to employ a transformed and renewable energy driven electricity systems. “They can leap-frog to a 21st-century power system -- and they should reap the benefits,” said van der Hoeven.
Forecasting of renewable energy production was identified as being vitally important in the design of a transformed electrify system. “It makes a huge difference if you use advanced forecasting or not," said IEA report author Simon Müller. “It gets you a huge step forward no matter what forecast you use.”
Storage will also play an important role in a transformed system, with batteries providing voltage regulation and other grid services while pumped hydro provides large-volume storage. IEA observed that pumped hydro capacity currently available in Europe is being underutilized.
For sources of flexible generation capacity, the IEA pointed to natural gas, but the panel convened to discuss the report in Paris stated a number of times that natural gas should not be thought of as a “clean” fuel. “It is the cleanest fossil fuel we have, but is a fossil fuel,” said van der Hoeven. The IEA Executive Director suggested deploying gas with carbon capture and storage.